Thursday, August 4, 2011

Medicaid Subrogation Claims

Texas Medicaid Right of Recovery
Tex. Hum. Res. Code Sec.32.033 is the statute that creates the Texas Health and Human Services Commission's right of recovery. (To find the relevant sec. use the find control in your browser after you get to the general section.) The State has a separate cause of action against the tortfeasor for the amount it has paid for treatment for injuries in the accident. This is not a "lien" statute such a hospital may have for emergency care funds collected from the tortfeasor.

There are two types of claims, acute care and long term care. Different offices of the HHSC must be contacted. The Texas Medicaid & HealthCare Partnership handles casualty claims. Contact their web site for additional information and for the necessary authorization and notification forms (You must use Windows Explorer to contact this web site for these forms. 
They do not consider Chrome a secure browser). 

You must complete the Medical Authorization Form and the Tort Response Form before you will be provided information . On receipt of the tort response form, they should respond with 10 days usually with a subrogation letter and ten days later they should send an "amount letter". As in dealing with any agency, you should followup by phone to confirm that they received your notice and are sending the "amount letter". Be patient, but firm. These procedures are in a state of flux due to the federal "The Smart Act." The CMS has issued a interim final order. (it would help if they would speak English) with a comment peroid ending in November of 2013. These requlations will probably be implimented on January 1, 2014.


Although the telephone contact may be necessary to confirm which type of claim is involved, get the name of the contact and confirm any agreements in writing as you would in dealing with another attorney. The amount or character of the claims may change over time and should be confirmed in writing before any settlement is made.

A. Acute care claims.
Acute care claims are claims arising from an action that gives rise to a personal injury claim against a third party. The HHSC claim is against the portion of the claim that involves medical benefits (claims for pain and suffering cannot be used to avoid this claim, but it does not include property damage claims or loss of earnings).

1. Applicant's Duties
The applicant must notify the HHSC within 90 days of an unsettled tort claim, insurance coverage or potential cause of action.

2. Attorney's Duties
The attorney must notify the HHSC within 45 days of representation. The Tort Response Form should satisfy the content requirements.

3. Limit on attorney fees.

The attorney may not charge the client for recovery of Medicaid funds more than 15%.

4. Waiver of Attorney Fees.

The HHSC may waive recovery if the cost of recovery would exceed the amount that could be recovered. If the States waives recovery, the plaintiff's attorney must waive attorney fees on that portion of the settlement.

5. Balance Billing.

If a provider accepts Medicare payments they are prohibited from seeking the difference between their private rate and the Medicare reimbursement from the patient.

If there is a conflict over a waiver or reduction of an acute care claim, contact, Christy Dillman at christy.dillman@HHSC.state.tx.us.

B. Long Term Care Claims.

Long term care claims, including nursing home care, are for claims that do not fall in to the acute care category. The applicant's and the attorney's duties are the same as for acute care claims. The same limits for attorney fees and balance billing, also, apply. The same forms as are used for acute care claims should be used for long term care claims

The recovery a claim for long term care is handled by the Health and Human Services Commission. You may be involved with two sections of the same agency for the same transaction. The requlations are found at 1 Tex. Admin. Code Sec.354. The contact are:

Third party Recovery
P.O. Box 149081
Austin, Texas 78714-9081
Mail Code #-400
512-430-3400

For a reduction or waiver contact:

Staff Attorney
P.O.Box 149030
Austin, Texas 78714-9030
512-438-3126

This post is for information only by attorneys. It should not be considered as legal advice. If you are considering any action, contact an attorney personally as the facts of an individual case may change the action to be taken. If you decide to proceed without advice, you are on your own.

Most of the credit for this post goes to Pi-Yi Mayo of Baytown, Texas who submitted a paper on the same topic to the Advanced Personal Injury Law Course 2011. A more extensive treatment can be found on his web site.

Submitted by:

Ben A. Goff, Attorney


Thursday, July 28, 2011

Friday, July 22, 2011

Enica Joyner killed in apartment house fire

Enica Joyner killed in apartment house fire
Enica Joyner, age 11, along with one other person died in an apartment fire in Arlington, Texas on July 3, 2011. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram report that some of the residents were forced to jump from a second-floor breezeway and at least one person fled the building in flames. One resident, Karen Seabolt, told the newspaper, “Iren outside and saw a man in the parking lot with his legs and hands on fire.
Te fire started around 1 p.m Saturday at the Tanglewood Apartments. Fire officials reported that when the firemen arrived the second floor was in flames. James Self, Arlington assistant fire chief stated that it was “curious” that when they arrived that the fire was intense.
The Dallas Morning News reported that nvestigators determined that children were burning paper with a lighter in a breezeway when the fire got out of control. The kids, all under the age of 10, didn't tell anyone about the blaze, causing it to grow substantially before rescue officials were alerted.
Cases such as this require prompt investigation. If you are a relative or friend of the family, please recommend to the family that they contact their family attorney to determine if further investigation is warranted.

Ben Goff

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

DEBT CEILING

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, SECTION. 4 states:
“The validity of the public debt of the United
States, ... shall not be questioned.” For a document as vague as the Constitution that is pretty specific.

Bruce Bartlett:

What Debt Limit? Plan B is the 14th Amendment: I now feel even more strongly that the Fourteenth Amendment trumps the debt limit. There is strong support for this position in an article by George Washington University law professor Michael Abramowicz. Writing in the Tulsa Law Journal (“Beyond Balanced Budgets, Fourteenth Amendment Style,” 33:2, Winter 1997, pp. 561-612), he concludes that any government action “making uncertain whether or not a debt will be honored is unconstitutional.” As Abramowicz explains:
A debt does not become valid or invalid only at the moment payment is due. A debt’s validity may be assessed at any time, and a debt is valid only if the law provides that it will be honored. Therefore, a requirement that the government not question a debt’s validity does not kick in only once the time comes for the government to make a payment on the debt. Rather, the duty not to question is a continuous one. If as a result of government actions, a debt will not be paid absent future governmental action, that debt is effectively invalid. The high level of generality recognizes that instead of referring to payment of debts, the Clause bans government action at any time that affects the validity of debt instruments…. Moreover, there is no such thing as a valid debt that will nonetheless not be honored.

In Perry v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States government bond "went beyond the congressional power". 294 U.S. 330 at 354.

Since the entire debt limit process is unconstitutional, why doesn't the President just say so. It really makes sense that a minority in the House should not be able to hold the nation hostage to get their way.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Dale Curruth of Little Elm was killed on April 14, 2011 in a motor vehicle accident.

The Dallas Morning News reported: A 23-year-old Little Elm man died Thursday after his motorcycle collided with a passenger vehicle in front of Wal-mart at FM423 and Eldorado Parkway.

Frisco police identified the motorcyclist as Dale Curruth.

Investigators say the vehicle was traveling southbound on FM423 at 4:45 p.m. when it attempted to turn left into the Wal-Mart parking lot. Curruth was traveling northbound on FM423 and struck the side of the passenger vehicle, which had failed to yield the right of way.

Curruth, who was wearing a helmet, was transported to Centennial Medical Center in Frisco, where he was pronounced dead.

The intersection was closed for nearly five hours after the wreck. The investigation is continuing. No charges have been filed.

Few details were available from the news reports so it is difficult to determine legal responsibility. As in most cases of this type it is important to have an early investigation by an independent objective source. Contact by a friend or relative with the family attorney would assist the family at this tragic time.

Carmen Mitchell

mgmtexaslaw.com